Audit Lowe Down – Current / non-current liability classification

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

In the previous blog, we discussed the new standards in place for 31 December 2024, however the current / non-current classification changes deserve a bit more attention.


The revised AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements introduces a slightly amended definition of current liabilities and additional guidance around matters such as breaches of covenants, waivers and periods of grace.

Entities should consider the timing of testing of bank covenants since if they are tested:

  • On or before the reporting date – compliance with the covenants is considered in presenting the liability as current or non-current
  • After the reporting date – they are not considered as part of the current / non-current classification.


For example, an entity has a covenant which is tested annually at 31 January 2025, but they do not consider the existence of any potential breach of this covenant when classifying the liability for their 31 December 2024 financials since the testing date is after the reporting period.


However, additional disclosures are now required where an entity is required to give information about the existence of covenants, including facts and circumstances that indicate the entity may have difficulty complying with the covenant.


In the example above, if the entity considered that they may breach the January covenants due to current trading results, then this information would be disclosed in the 31 December 2024 financial statements.


Further disclosures in this example would depend on whether an actual breach occurred:

  • If breach occurred but going concern basis was still appropriate, then this would be disclosed as a non-adjusting event after the reporting date
  • If breach occurred and going concern was no longer appropriate, then the financial statements for 31 December 2024 would be prepared on a non-going concern basis
  • If no breach occurred, then a disclosure would be useful to clarify if facts and circumstances about a potential breach were included.


If an entity receives a waiver or period of grace in relation to a breached covenant, then this should be received by the borrower prior to the reporting period for it to be useful for the financial statements.


Entities should carefully review their loan agreements and covenants, to ensure accurate classification of liabilities under the new guidance since action may need to be taken prior to the end of the reporting period.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


July 1, 2025
Large proprietary limited – are you one? Tips and traps for your assessment. In Australia, being classified as a large proprietary limited company means that you have to prepare, and lodge audited financial statements with ASIC under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act), however many companies are not necessarily applying the thresholds appropriately. A proprietary company is large if it meets at least 2 of the following thresholds: Consolidated revenue ≥ $50 million Consolidated gross assets ≥ $25 million 100 or more employees. These thresholds seem simple, however some points to note: The calculations must be performed applying ALL accounting standards so even if you are preparing special purpose financial statements, then you will need to assess these thresholds as if you were applying all standards, including: AASB 16 Leases – this standard would add a right of use asset to your balance sheet potentially significantly increasing your gross assets. AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements – if you have controlled entities then the inclusion of their income statement and balance sheet may significantly increase each of the thresholds. AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures / AASB 11 Joint Arrangements – if you have entities over which you have significant influence or joint control then applying equity accounting or including your share of assets and revenue would affect the thresholds. In determining the number of employees, the Act is clear that it is all full-time and part-time employees (on a pro-rata basis), however casual employees need to be considered. For example, are they genuinely casual with varying hours / shifts each week or are they in substance a permanent member of your team but just employed on a casual basis.  The thresholds need to be met at the end of the financial year and therefore entities should track their performance during the year so they are aware if they will meet the definition of a large proprietary company at year end.
June 17, 2025
In a previous blog, we discussed the changes to the accounting standards relating to classification of current / non-current liabilities on the balance sheet. We have been receiving a number of questions on this topic and have provided some practical scenarios below as well as some actions for you as we approach 30 June reporting dates.
June 13, 2025
High Court special leave application granted to appeal Bendel Case decision The Australian Taxation Office has been granted special leave to appeal to the High Court from the Full Federal Court decision in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15. During March 2025 we released a Tax Alert ( see here ) explaining the current view of the ATO following the Full Federal Court decision that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) owed by a discretionary trust to a corporate beneficiary is not a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The ATO also issued an Interim Decision Impact Statement ( see here ) in response to the Full Federal Court decision, providing information for taxpayers and advisers in relation to the details of the case and issues decided by the court.
More Posts