JobKeeper Payments Expanded to include Religious Practitioners

Generally, religious practitioners may not be classified as "employees" for tax purposes, and may receive financial support via non monetary benefits and/or a stipend, rather than salary and wages.

The eligibility rules for the JobKeeper Payment scheme have now been expanded to include religious institutions in respect of religious practitioners (with the exception of those that are students only) who are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

What is a "Registered Religious Institution"?

A "registered religious institution" means an institution that is a registered charity and registered as a charity that is advancing religion under the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission Act 2012.

Who is a "Religious Practitioner"?

A "religious practitioner" for the purposes of the JobKeeper Payment scheme is a minister of religion or a full-time member of a religious order.

The expanded eligibility requirements provide that individuals are eligible religious practitioners in a fortnight if they meet all of the following in that fortnight :

They are not employed by the religious institution;
They are a religious practitioner and they do activities or a series of activities in pursuit of their vocation as a religious practitioner, and as a member of the registered religious institution;
They meet the 1 March 2020 requirements; and
They meet the nomination requirements (explained below).

The eligibility requirements for religious practitioners are largely consistent with those for other employees (ie. the 1 March 2020 requirements), and we have explained these requirements in a previous Tax Alert – click here .

Payment Condition for Religious Institutions

A payment condition applies to an eligible religious institution concerning payments or benefits provided to a religious practitioner to qualify for the JobKeeper Payment scheme in respect of the religious practitioner.

The expanded rules provide that an eligible religious institution meets the payment condition in respect of an individual for a fortnight if it:

Makes one or more payments to the individual from which an amount must be withheld (ie. PAYG withholding); or
Provides a benefit to the individual whether that is a fringe benefit or an exempt benefit under the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986.

We understand that where a religious practitioner is normally paid a salary (and/or has expenses paid on their behalf by the religious institution, ie. fringe benefits) and they have assessed they are entitled to receive the JobKeeper Payment, they will meet the payment condition where they continue to receive a salary (and/or fringe benefits) to the value of $1,500 (gross) per fortnight.

We also note that where an institution usually pays religious practitioners for a regular period of more than a fortnight (such as monthly), then those payments are to be allocated to a fortnight or fortnights in a reasonable manner.

Special Nomination Notice

If you have enrolled or intend to enrol for the JobKeeper Payment, you need to complete the JobKeeper religious practitioner nomination notice ( click here ) to:

Notify your eligible religious practitioners that you intend to participate in the scheme; and
Confirm they agree to be nominated and receive payments from you as part of the scheme.

Both the registered religious institution and the nominated religious practitioner need to complete the form. The completed form does not need to be sent to the ATO, however it should be kept as part of your tax records.

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

< Older Post Newer Post >

Tax Alert - Will credit card surcharges be banned?

February 19, 2025

Will credit card surcharges be banned? If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? This alert looks at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But is the issue as simple as it seems?

Tax Alert - Is there a problem paying your super when you die?

February 17, 2025

Is there a problem paying your super when you die? The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies? The value of superannuation in Australia is now around $4.1 trillion. When you die, your super does not automatically form part of your estate but instead, is paid to your eligible beneficiaries by the fund trustee according to the fund rules, superannuation law, and any death benefit nomination you made. Complaints to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority ( AFCA ) about the handling of death benefits surged sevenfold between 2021 and 2023. The critical issue was delays in payments. While most super death benefits are paid within 3 months, for others it can take well over a year. The super laws do not specify a time period only that super needs to be paid to beneficiaries “as soon as practicable” after the death of the member.

Tax Alert - Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth

February 13, 2025

Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth “Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke The Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) thinks that wealthy babyboomer Australians, particularly those with successful family-controlled businesses, are planning and structuring to dispose of assets in a way in which the tax outcomes might not be in accord with the ATO’s expectations. If you are within the ATO’s Top 500 (Australia's largest and wealthiest private groups) or Next 5,000 (Australian residents who, together with their associates, control a net wealth of over $50 million) programs, expect the ATO to be paying close attention to how money flows through the entities you control. A critical issue for many business owners is how to effectively (and compliantly) benefit from a successful business. In many cases, the owners have spent years building the business and the business has become not only a substantial asset, but a lucrative source of income either through salary and wages, dividends, or through the sale of shares or assets. Generally, under tax law, you can legitimately structure assets if there is a good reason to do so - like for asset protection, but if you tip across the line and the only viable reason for a structure is to reduce tax, then you risk the ATO taking a very close look at your operations or worse, denying any tax benefits under the general anti-avoidance rules in Part IVA of the tax rules, designed to combat “blatant, artificial or contrived” tax avoidance activities. “We’re seeing that succession planning behaviour is primarily done by group heads who are approaching retirement. They typically own groups that family members are a part of, and wealth is transferred to the next generation to keep it within the family (via trusts and other means),” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke said in a recent update.