Practice Update – March 2025

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

How to master employer obligations in 2025


Taxpayers who employ staff should remember the following important dates and obligations:


Fringe benefits tax (FBT)

31 March 2025 marks the end of the 2024-25 FBT year. Employers should remember the following regarding their FBT tax time obligations.

  • They should identify if they have provided a fringe benefit. If they have, they should determine the taxable value to work out if they have an FBT liability.
  • They should lodge an FBT return and pay any FBT owed by 21 May 2025. If their registered tax agent lodges electronically for them, they have until 25 June 2025.
  • They should keep the right records to support their FBT position.


Pay as you go (PAYG) withholding

Taxpayers need to withhold the right amount of tax from payments they make to their employees and other payees, and pay those amounts to the ATO.


Single touch payroll (STP)

Employers should finalise their STP data by 14 July 2025 for the 2024/25 financial year (there may be a later due date for any closely held payees).


Super guarantee (SG)

  • 28 January, 28 April, 28 July and 28 October are the quarterly due dates for making SG payments
  • The SG rate is currently 11.5% of an employee's ordinary time earnings. From 1 July 2025, it will increase to 12.0%.
  • Taxpayers should ensure SG for their eligible employees is paid in full, on time and to the right super fund, otherwise they will be liable for the SG charge.

ATO's tips to help taxpayers stay on top of their BAS


The ATO has the following tips to help taxpayers get their BAS right before they lodge:

  • They should make sure they enter the figures for their obligations at the correct label, and only complete applicable fields.
  • If lodging online, or through a registered tax or BAS agent, they may be able to get an extra 2 or 4 weeks to lodge and pay.
  • If they have nothing to report for the period, they can lodge a 'nil' BAS online by selecting 'Prepare' and then 'Prepare as nil', or they can call the ATO's automated service "any time of the day".
  • If they made a mistake on their last BAS, instead of lodging a revision, they may be able to use their current BAS to fix it. For example, they can use label 1A to adjust GST on sales, or label 1B to adjust GST on purchases.
  • They can also use their BAS to vary an instalment amount.

Claiming fuel tax credits when rates change


Fuel tax credits changed on 3 February, and taxpayers could receive more savings for fuel they have acquired on and from this date. Different rates apply based on the type of fuel, when it was acquired and what activity it is used for.


The ATO has the following tips for taxpayers to ensure they are claiming correctly.

  • They can use the ATO's 'eligibility tool' on its website to find out if they can claim fuel tax credits for fuel they have acquired and used.
  • They can use the ATO's online fuel tax credit calculator (which should automatically apply the right rate) to work out their claim.
  • They can lodge their BAS via Online services or a registered tax or BAS agent (lodging via an agent can allow them extra time to lodge and pay).

ATO "busts" Not-For-Profits myths


As the Not-for-profit (NFP) self-review return is due in March, the ATO has recently published a document 'busting' various NFP 'myths'.


Taxpayer's claim for input tax credits unsuccessful


In a recent decision, the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) rejected a taxpayer's claim for input tax credits on the basis that all the relevant GST returns (ie. BASs) were lodged out of time.


For the GST periods from 1 October 2015 to 31 March 2017, the taxpayer filed each of her GST returns more than four years after they were due. The taxpayer still claimed input tax credits totalling over $10,000 for this period.


The ATO disallowed this claim, on the basis that none of the input tax credits were claimed within the four-year period, as required by the GST Act.


The ART upheld the ATO's decision, noting that, as the taxpayer did not file the GST returns within the four-year period "she did not have input tax credits taken into account . . . As a consequence, . . . (she) simply ceased to be entitled to those input tax credits."


ATO's appeal against decision that UPEs are not "loans" fails


The Full Federal Court recently dismissed the ATO's appeal against an AAT decision that unpaid present entitlements (UPEs) owing by a trust to a corporate beneficiary were not "loans" for Division 7A purposes.


A corporate beneficiary had become entitled to a share of the income of a trust for the 2013 to 2017 income years. Parts of these entitlements remained outstanding, resulting in UPEs. The ATO treated these UPEs as loans from the corporate beneficiary back to the trust (and, in consequence, as "deemed dividends" made to the trust).


The AAT held at first instance that a loan had not been made in this case.


The Full Federal Court upheld the AAT's decision, noting that a loan for Division 7A purposes requires an obligation to repay an amount, not merely the creation of an obligation to pay an amount (such as when a trust distributes income to a beneficiary).


We recently prepared a detailed Tax Alert on the Bendels Case decision, to read click here.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


September 4, 2026
Yesterday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers released draft legislation to implement the key components of the 30% minimum trust tax on discretionary trusts announced in the Federal Budget during May 2026.
September 2, 2026
Discretionary trusts and the proposed 30% minimum tax Discretionary trusts, often referred to as family trusts, have been a popular structure for Australian families and businesses for many decades. They are commonly used to operate family businesses, hold investments and assist with succession planning. Their flexibility, together with asset protection and estate planning benefits, has made them an attractive option for many groups. In the 2026–27 Federal Budget, the Government announced a significant proposed change. From 1 July 2028 , trustees of discretionary trusts would generally be required to pay a minimum tax of 30% on the trust's taxable income . According to the Government, the proposal is intended to better align the tax paid on trust income with that paid by salary and wage earners, while reducing opportunities to split income between family members. However, the announcement has generated considerable debate. Professional bodies, business groups and tax advisers have expressed concerns that the changes could increase complexity and compliance costs for many genuine family businesses and investment structures. How the proposal is expected to work Under the proposal, the trustee would generally pay the minimum 30% tax on the trust's taxable income. Where trust income is distributed to individual beneficiaries or certain other non-corporate beneficiaries , those beneficiaries would generally receive a non-refundable tax offset recognising the tax already paid by the trustee. This is intended to reduce the risk of the same income being taxed twice, but while maintaining the impact of the 30% minimum tax rate. Importantly, the minimum tax would not apply to every trust . The Government has indicated that a number of trusts would be excluded, including fixed trusts, widely held trusts, complying superannuation funds, charitable trusts, deceased estates, special disability trusts and genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income and certain income relating to vulnerable minors would also be excluded. The Government has also stated that more than 90% of small businesses are not expected to be affected. While that may be reassuring for some taxpayers, there are still some important issues that could affect family groups using discretionary trusts. What could this mean in practice? One area likely to receive close attention is the use of companies as beneficiaries of family trusts. Many family groups have historically distributed some trust income to a company. This can provide flexibility in managing cash flow, retaining profits within the business and funding future growth. Under the proposed rules, however, the corporate beneficiary would not receive a tax offset for the tax already paid by the trustee . In many cases this will mean that income distributed from a discretionary trust to a company would be subject to double taxation. Another practical impact of the proposed change is that some family groups may find it more difficult to fully utilise existing tax losses. While the impact will depend on each group's circumstances, the proposed minimum tax is likely to reduce some of the flexibility that currently exists when managing taxable income across a family structure within many groups. The Government has also proposed a temporary three-year rollover period, commencing from 1 July 2027, to help restructure into alternative business structures , such as companies or fixed trusts, without triggering immediate income tax or capital gains tax consequences. While this may assist some groups, restructuring is rarely straightforward. Depending on the circumstances, it might be necessary to consider things like stamp duty, loan approvals, financing arrangements, contract changes, licensing requirements and professional advice. Even relatively simple restructures can involve significant time and cost, so careful planning will be important. The rules are not yet final At this stage, the proposal remains subject to consultation . Treasury released a consultation paper in July 2026 seeking feedback on a range of design issues, including how the new rules would operate in different situations. Final legislation has not yet been introduced , meaning aspects of the proposal could still change before the rules become law. For this reason, most groups utilising discretionary trust structures should avoid making major structural decisions based solely on the announcement. Instead, it is sensible to monitor developments while considering whether existing structures are likely to remain appropriate if the proposal proceeds. What should you do now? For many families, discretionary trusts are about much more than tax. They can continue to provide valuable asset protection, succession planning and business flexibility. The proposed changes do not remove those benefits, nor do they prevent discretionary trusts from continuing to be used. However, the proposal does have the potential to change the tax outcomes for some family groups, particularly those with more complex structures or those that regularly distribute income to companies. With the proposed start date still some time away, there is an opportunity to pause and carefully understand how the changes may affect your circumstances and consider whether any planning or restructuring might be appropriate. As the legislation develops, we can help you assess the impact on your business or investment structure and determine whether any action is warranted.
August 4, 2026
Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.
More Posts