Tax Alert - Section 100A guidance now finalised

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

ATO Guidance targeting trust reimbursement agreements now finalised


The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has recently finalised its guidance in relation to trust distributions and “reimbursement agreements”. This guidance impacts all clients with family or discretionary trusts.


The final guidance contained within Taxation Ruling TR 2022/4 Income tax: Section 100A reimbursement agreements and Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2022/2 Section 100A reimbursement agreements – ATO compliance approach has been developed to support trustees and their advisors, who have been requesting clearer guidance to help them manage their tax obligations.


The ATO guidance has been finalised following an extended consultation period with the tax community, and recommended changes have been incorporated based on this feedback.


The ATO focus surrounding Section 100A relates to trust distributions made to beneficiaries, in order to achieve a tax advantage where the funds relating to the distributions are not paid out to a beneficiary, or are in some way reimbursed back to the trustee or other parties.


Whilst these final documents do not significantly depart from the draft versions released in March 2022, which gave rise to much debate on the ATO’s renewed focus on trust arrangements (see our previous Tax Alert here), there are some notable changes (see below) and they do provide additional examples which provide further clarity for trustees and advisers as to what trust arrangements the ATO will focus their attention on.


What are the notable changes?


The finalised guidance includes a few changes to the previous draft documents, including the abolition of the “blue zone”, an expansion of “green zone scenarios” concerning distributions, in particular providing a two-year timeframe to pay distributions and the broadening of individuals/entities to whom distributions can be made with less stringent requirements to pay.


However, it is unfortunate that the final guidance still applies retrospectively to trust entitlements that arose prior to 1 July 2022 in certain circumstances.


We note that the ATO has confirmed it will not allocate any compliance resources to review any trust arrangements entered into before 1 July 2014 which are considered to be “low risk”.



What are the next steps?


Given the potential retrospective nature of this ruling, reviews of previous income years distributions may be necessary.  Furthermore, careful consideration of the appointment of trust income for the year ending 30 June 2023 and beyond will need to be adopted.


Lowe Lippmann intends to provide further guidance on managing trust distributions by explaining the most salient issues in the new year once the full implications of these changes are fully considered.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.


July 7, 2026
High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case The High Court recently handed down its decision in Bendel’s Case, confirming that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) between a discretionary trust and a beneficiary company does not fall within the extended definition of a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The Australian Taxation Office released a Decision Impact Statement in response to the High Court findings, concluding the High Court's reasoning makes it clear that where a beneficiary company is entitled to a share of trust income that remains unpaid (a UPE) and the company takes no positive actions to call for payment of the entitlement, this will not fall within the expanded definition of a "loan" for Division 7A purposes. This is in contradiction to the ATO’s historical position that treated UPEs as "loans".
July 5, 2026
Government's tax reform package The Government has recently legislated several of the tax reform measures announced in the 2026 Federal Budget (and in later media releases). These include, among other things: Replacing the CGT discount with cost base indexation and a 30% minimum tax on gains accruing from 1 July 2027 (including gains on pre-CGT assets); Increasing the small business turnover threshold for the 50% active asset reduction from $2 million to $10 million; Limiting negative gearing for residential property to new residential dwellings from 1 July 2027 (subject to transitional rules); and Introducing the Working Australians Tax Offset from 1 July 2027, and the $1,000 instant tax deduction for work-related expenses from 1 July 2026. After a round of consultation, the Government has also announced further proposed measures, broadly including (among others): A new targeted CGT discount for investors in innovative start-ups; Barring SMSFs from utilising future limited recourse borrowing arrangements ( LRBAs ) to acquire residential property; and  Exempting income of discretionary testamentary trusts from the minimum tax proposed for trusts. We recently released a Tax Alert considering the legislation restricting SMSFFs using residential property LRBAs – to read click here . For full details of each of the 2026 Federal Budget announcements, please see our Federal Budget Tax Alert – to read click here .
June 28, 2026
Legislation restricting SMSFs using residential property LRBAs has now passed Parliament The Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No 1) Bill 2026 ( the Reform No 1 Bill ) was passed by Parliament on Thursday 25 June 2026. Schedule 5 of the Reform No 1 Bill amends section 67A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 to restrict future limited recourse borrowing arrangements ( LRBAs ) on real property to investments in “business real property” (as defined in section 66 of the SIS Act). Residential property of any kind is excluded from the definition of “business real property” in section 66 of the SIS Act. We note this also excludes newly constructed residential property, which is a distinction at odds with recent exemptions being given to new-builds with other Budget Night tax changes relating to negative gearing and restricting the CGT 50% discount. Super funds are not generally allowed to borrow for investments, but there has been a concession allowing a self-managed super fund ( SMSF ) to borrow money to buy single assets like property, if their loans were set up in line with particular requirements, known as LRBAs. This change means an SMSF will not be able to borrow to buy residential property after the start date of these changes.
More Posts