Tax Alert - Expanding the net for Vacant Residential Land Tax in Victoria

Blog Layout

Tax Alert - Expanding the net for Vacant Residential Land Tax in Victoria

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Background

For the year ending 31 December 2024, VRLT only impacts properties in 16 of Melbourne’s inner and middle suburbs, which is imposed in addition to any other land tax or surcharge land tax that may apply.

A property is taken to be “vacant” if it has not been lived in for more than six months out of a calendar year, and this does not need to be a consecutive period of occupancy. Determining whether a property is “vacant” is done by considering the use of the land in the year that immediately precedes the relevant land tax year (ie. the use in the 2024 calendar year will determine whether VRLT applies in 2025).

VRLT is an annual tax for vacant land (subject to some exemptions), and for the year ending 31 December 2024, the VRLT rate is 1.0% of the capital improved value (CIV) of taxable land. The CIV of a property is a value of the land, buildings and any other capital improvements made to the property as determined by the general valuation process. It is displayed on the council rates notice for the property.

What are the new changes?

The State Taxation Acts and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2023 (Vic) (the Bill) has recently passed both houses of the Victorian Parliament to amend the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic), and there will be four important changes to the VRLT rules from 1 January 2025 and 2026.

1) Applying VRLT to all vacant residential land in Victoria

For the year ending 31 December 2024, the VRLT only applies to vacant residential land within 16 of Melbourne’s inner and middle suburbs - click here to see current list.

Firstly, these changes will expand the current inner and middle suburbs geographic area to the whole state of Victoria from 1 January 2025.

2) Extending the VRLT to include certain “unimproved land” in Metropolitan Melbourne

For the year ending 31 December 2024, land is not considered vacant for up to two years from the date a building permit is issued for any significant renovation or reconstruction, and this two-year grace period will apply for the majority of Victoria.

Under these changes, land undergoing significant renovation or reconstruction within certain areas of metropolitan Melbourne will not be considered vacant for up to five years from 1 January 2026.

We must note that the “unimproved land” classification is simply vacant land, even without a dwelling of any kind on it. The five-year period is considered to provide adequate time for an owner of residential land to commence construction of a residence before it is regarded as vacant residential land.

3) Applying VRLT to all vacant residential land in Victoria

For the year ending 31 December 2024, the VRLT rate is 1.0% of the CIV of taxable land (as explained above).

In the eleventh hour of the Bill passing through the Victorian Parliament, the Victorian Green Party members proposed a change to the rate of VRLT to increase each consecutive year the property remains vacant.

Under these changes, the single VRLT rate will be expanded as follows from 1 January 2025:

No. years residential property is vacant	Proposed new VRLT rates %
1 year	1.0%
2nd consecutive year	2.0%
3rd consecutive year	3.0%

In other words, if land was liable for VRLT in the preceding tax year (ie. 1 January to 31 December 2024) but not the tax year preceding that tax year (ie. 1 January to 31 December 2023), a VRLT rate of 2.0% will be applied to the land from 1 January 2025.

Furthermore, if land was liable for VRLT in the last 2 preceding tax years (ie. 1 January to 31 December 2023 and 2024), a VRLT rate of 3.0% will be applied to the land from 1 January 2025.

4) Launching a trial to enforce VRLT, rather than rely on self-reporting

The Victoria Government will also launch a trial for a new enforcement system across metropolitan Melbourne, rather than relying on self-reporting and landowners. The trial, to be led by the Victorian State Revenue Office (SRO), would use utility data (ie. electricity and water usage) to identify homes that are not being used.

This would mean landowners identified by the SRO with potentially vacant properties would be asked provide proof that people live at their residence during the relevant calendar year.

The trial is proposed to start in 2024 with apartment towers and expand in 2025 to include inner and middle suburbs of Melbourne.

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

< Older Post Newer Post >

Tax Alert - Will credit card surcharges be banned?

February 19, 2025

Will credit card surcharges be banned? If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? This alert looks at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But is the issue as simple as it seems?

Tax Alert - Is there a problem paying your super when you die?

February 17, 2025

Is there a problem paying your super when you die? The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies? The value of superannuation in Australia is now around $4.1 trillion. When you die, your super does not automatically form part of your estate but instead, is paid to your eligible beneficiaries by the fund trustee according to the fund rules, superannuation law, and any death benefit nomination you made. Complaints to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority ( AFCA ) about the handling of death benefits surged sevenfold between 2021 and 2023. The critical issue was delays in payments. While most super death benefits are paid within 3 months, for others it can take well over a year. The super laws do not specify a time period only that super needs to be paid to beneficiaries “as soon as practicable” after the death of the member.

Tax Alert - Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth

February 13, 2025

Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth “Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke The Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) thinks that wealthy babyboomer Australians, particularly those with successful family-controlled businesses, are planning and structuring to dispose of assets in a way in which the tax outcomes might not be in accord with the ATO’s expectations. If you are within the ATO’s Top 500 (Australia's largest and wealthiest private groups) or Next 5,000 (Australian residents who, together with their associates, control a net wealth of over $50 million) programs, expect the ATO to be paying close attention to how money flows through the entities you control. A critical issue for many business owners is how to effectively (and compliantly) benefit from a successful business. In many cases, the owners have spent years building the business and the business has become not only a substantial asset, but a lucrative source of income either through salary and wages, dividends, or through the sale of shares or assets. Generally, under tax law, you can legitimately structure assets if there is a good reason to do so - like for asset protection, but if you tip across the line and the only viable reason for a structure is to reduce tax, then you risk the ATO taking a very close look at your operations or worse, denying any tax benefits under the general anti-avoidance rules in Part IVA of the tax rules, designed to combat “blatant, artificial or contrived” tax avoidance activities. “We’re seeing that succession planning behaviour is primarily done by group heads who are approaching retirement. They typically own groups that family members are a part of, and wealth is transferred to the next generation to keep it within the family (via trusts and other means),” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke said in a recent update.