TAX ALERT - TRAVEL EXPENSES BEING TARGETED BY THE AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE

Blog Layout

TAX ALERT - TRAVEL EXPENSES BEING TARGETED BY THE AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

The Government has recently made various announcements in relation to denying or restricting tax deductions in relation to travel expenses incurred by taxpayers.

Firstly, the Treasury has released draft legislation in relation to denying tax deductions for travel expensesn relating to inspecting, maintaining or collecting rent for a residential rental property.

The draft legislation is effective from 1 July 2017 and designed to apply to certain taxpayers only. the guidance released from the Treasury includes various examples to explain which travel expenses may be denied a tax deduction, however, some consider the examples do not cover all components of travel expenses and create uncertainty for taxpayers.

Secondly, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) recently released Draft TR 2017/D6: Income tax and fringe benefits tax: when are deductions allowed for employees travel expenses?

The draft ruling consolidates and updates a number of former ATO guidance documents. It sets out the ATO's interpretations on the general principles for determining whether an employee's travel and accommodation would otherwise be deductible for income tax and FBT purposes.

< Older Post Newer Post >

Tax Alert - Will credit card surcharges be banned?

February 19, 2025

Will credit card surcharges be banned? If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? This alert looks at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But is the issue as simple as it seems?

Tax Alert - Is there a problem paying your super when you die?

February 17, 2025

Is there a problem paying your super when you die? The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies? The value of superannuation in Australia is now around $4.1 trillion. When you die, your super does not automatically form part of your estate but instead, is paid to your eligible beneficiaries by the fund trustee according to the fund rules, superannuation law, and any death benefit nomination you made. Complaints to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority ( AFCA ) about the handling of death benefits surged sevenfold between 2021 and 2023. The critical issue was delays in payments. While most super death benefits are paid within 3 months, for others it can take well over a year. The super laws do not specify a time period only that super needs to be paid to beneficiaries “as soon as practicable” after the death of the member.

Tax Alert - Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth

February 13, 2025

Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth “Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke The Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) thinks that wealthy babyboomer Australians, particularly those with successful family-controlled businesses, are planning and structuring to dispose of assets in a way in which the tax outcomes might not be in accord with the ATO’s expectations. If you are within the ATO’s Top 500 (Australia's largest and wealthiest private groups) or Next 5,000 (Australian residents who, together with their associates, control a net wealth of over $50 million) programs, expect the ATO to be paying close attention to how money flows through the entities you control. A critical issue for many business owners is how to effectively (and compliantly) benefit from a successful business. In many cases, the owners have spent years building the business and the business has become not only a substantial asset, but a lucrative source of income either through salary and wages, dividends, or through the sale of shares or assets. Generally, under tax law, you can legitimately structure assets if there is a good reason to do so - like for asset protection, but if you tip across the line and the only viable reason for a structure is to reduce tax, then you risk the ATO taking a very close look at your operations or worse, denying any tax benefits under the general anti-avoidance rules in Part IVA of the tax rules, designed to combat “blatant, artificial or contrived” tax avoidance activities. “We’re seeing that succession planning behaviour is primarily done by group heads who are approaching retirement. They typically own groups that family members are a part of, and wealth is transferred to the next generation to keep it within the family (via trusts and other means),” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke said in a recent update.