Tax Alert - Vic Land Tax exemption for leasing land in primary production business

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Vic Land Tax exemption for leasing land in primary production business

The Victorian Supreme Court has allowed a taxpayer’s successful appeal from a decision of the VCAT and found that it was entitled to an exemption from land tax under section 67 of the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic) on the basis that the land was used by the taxpayer primarily production land.

Section 67 provides an exemption for land located wholly or partly in greater Melbourne, that is wholly or partly in an urban zone, where the Commissioner determines that land held by the trustee of a discretionary trust is used solely or primarily for a business of primary production.

The taxpayer, the corporate trustee of a discretionary family trust, was assessed in the 2018 and 2019 land tax years for land tax on the land, which it leased to a Partnership made up of some of the family members.

In determining the principal business of the taxpayer, at the Tribunal level (leading to the Supreme Court decision) there was a comparison of the gross income, labour employed, and capital employed in each respective business.

The Tribunal found that Mr. M (the key individual involved in the activities on the land, a director of the corporate trustee and one of the partners in the Partnership) undertook the majority of the taxpayer’s cattle farming activity himself and was ordinarily engaged in the business of breeding cattle for sale in a substantially full-time capacity.

The Supreme Court considered that the rental payments made to the taxpayer were simply the mechanism for allocating revenue from the sale of cattle to the taxpayer (including that the taxpayer was also engaged in the relevant activities).

As such, this resulted in the Supreme Court finding that the taxpayer was “carrying on one integrated primary production business” and the rent received by the taxpayer from the Partnership arose from the taxpayer’s primary production business. The fact that the taxpayer and the Partnership held separate identities did not take away from this conclusion.

The Supreme Court also noted that the lease arrangement “was merely instrument designed to allocate revenue from primary production cattle business on land to the taxpayer”.

Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Practice Update – August 2026

August 4, 2026

Government to permanently extend $20,000 instant asset write-off The Government has recently introduced legislation that would make the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent for small businesses (as announced in the 2026 Federal Budget). If enacted, the changes would: permanently set the instant asset write-off threshold at $20,000 (instead of $1,000) for eligible depreciating assets first used, or installed ready for use, for a taxable purpose from 1 July 2026; and permanently set the general small business pool threshold at $20,000 from 1 July 2026. The changes would also further suspend the 'lock-out rule' until 30 June 2027. This rule otherwise prevents a business that has chosen not to use the simplified depreciation rules from re-entering the regime for five years.

Tax Alert - High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case

July 7, 2026

High Court decision and ATO statement on Bendel’s Case The High Court recently handed down its decision in Bendel’s Case, confirming that an unpaid present entitlement (or UPE) between a discretionary trust and a beneficiary company does not fall within the extended definition of a “loan” for Division 7A purposes. The Australian Taxation Office released a Decision Impact Statement in response to the High Court findings, concluding the High Court's reasoning makes it clear that where a beneficiary company is entitled to a share of trust income that remains unpaid (a UPE) and the company takes no positive actions to call for payment of the entitlement, this will not fall within the expanded definition of a "loan" for Division 7A purposes. This is in contradiction to the ATO’s historical position that treated UPEs as "loans".

Practice Update – July 2026

July 5, 2026

Government's tax reform package The Government has recently legislated several of the tax reform measures announced in the 2026 Federal Budget (and in later media releases). These include, among other things: Replacing the CGT discount with cost base indexation and a 30% minimum tax on gains accruing from 1 July 2027 (including gains on pre-CGT assets); Increasing the small business turnover threshold for the 50% active asset reduction from $2 million to $10 million; Limiting negative gearing for residential property to new residential dwellings from 1 July 2027 (subject to transitional rules); and Introducing the Working Australians Tax Offset from 1 July 2027, and the $1,000 instant tax deduction for work-related expenses from 1 July 2026. After a round of consultation, the Government has also announced further proposed measures, broadly including (among others): A new targeted CGT discount for investors in innovative start-ups; Barring SMSFs from utilising future limited recourse borrowing arrangements ( LRBAs ) to acquire residential property; and Exempting income of discretionary testamentary trusts from the minimum tax proposed for trusts. We recently released a Tax Alert considering the legislation restricting SMSFFs using residential property LRBAs – to read click here . For full details of each of the 2026 Federal Budget announcements, please see our Federal Budget Tax Alert – to read click here .