Blog Layout

Victorian Windfall Gains Tax bill passed

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Victorian Windfall Gains Tax bill passed


During May 2021, the Victorian State Budget first announced new measures to impose a windfall gains tax on the increase in value of land resulting from a rezoning.


The bill outlining the legislative framework for these measures has now passed through the Victorian parliament and received royal assent on 30 November 2021.


What is a windfall gains tax?


Broadly, the windfall gains tax (WGT) is a tax on unrealised property value gains which arise as result of a rezoning or amendment to a planning scheme (ie. the “taxable value uplift”) and occurs at the time land is rezoned (ie. a WGT event). The WGT is not a duty, nor is it a form of land tax.


Where an entity owns multiple parcels of land that are impacted by the same rezoning, WGT is levied on the aggregate taxable value uplift of the land, ignoring any decreases in taxable value.


Grouping and aggregation provisions are applicable so that the $100,000 threshold applies only once to properties owned by the same owner or group of associated entities and rezoned under the same planning scheme amendment.


The WGT will apply when the taxable value uplift of all land owned by an owner (or group) resulting from the same planning scheme amendment (ie. rezoning) exceeds $100,000, as follows:



Taxable Value uplift.... Windfall gains tax rate....
Less than $100,000 Nil
between $100,000 and $500,000 of 62.5% on the uplift in excess of $100,000
exceeding $500,000 of 50% on the whole uplift

Who pays WGT and when?


The owner of the land at the time of the rezoning is liable for the WGT.  Taxpayers will be issued with a notice setting out their WGT liability and the date by which payment must be made.


Landowners liable to pay WGT will be able to defer payment of up to 100% of the tax until the earlier of:

  • 30 years after the rezoning;
  • a dutiable transaction (other than an excluded dutiable transaction) occurring in relation to the rezoned land; and
  • a relevant acquisition (other than an excluded relevant acquisition) occurring in respect of a landholder who is the owner of the rezoned land.


When a liability is deferred, it will continue to accrue interest daily at the 10-year bond rate.


Although responsibility for the WGT is the landowner’s, and would ordinarily be triggered upon the sale of the WGT land, it is possible for a purchaser of affected land to assume liability for the WGT where the transaction involves no consideration and the transferee elects to assume the liability.


In these circumstances, the 30 year deadline (above) for the payment of the WGT does not reset; it remains 30 years from the WGT event (or rezoning).



Are there any exemptions?


Exemptions will apply in specified circumstances for up to 2 hectares of residential land (used primarily for residential or primary production purposes), land used exclusively for charitable purposes and land rezoned to correct technical errors.


Rezoning in relation to Growth and Infrastructure Contribution (GAIC) areas and public land zones will be excluded from the scope of the tax.


Certain exemptions and exclusions have been inserted to ensure that projects commenced before the announcement of the WGT will not be caught by these new provisions.  For example, WGT is not imposed where a contract of sale was executed before 15 May 2021, but a WGT event occurs after 1 July 2022 but before the land has been transferred.



When will these new rules start to apply?


The tax will apply for amendments to planning schemes that take effect on or after 1 July 2023. Transitional arrangements will apply for certain contracts, option arrangements and rezonings that were underway when the WGT was announced on 15 May 2021.


The WGT is a new tax imposed when a WGT event occurs, this being the time land is rezoned. When rezoning occurs, and provided no exemption applies, the taxpayer will be liable for WGT on the taxable value uplift, calculated as the difference in the capital improved value of the land before and after the rezoning.



Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

February 19, 2025
Will credit card surcharges be banned? If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? This alert looks at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But is the issue as simple as it seems?
February 17, 2025
Is there a problem paying your super when you die? The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies? The value of superannuation in Australia is now around $4.1 trillion. When you die, your super does not automatically form part of your estate but instead, is paid to your eligible beneficiaries by the fund trustee according to the fund rules, superannuation law, and any death benefit nomination you made. Complaints to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority ( AFCA ) about the handling of death benefits surged sevenfold between 2021 and 2023. The critical issue was delays in payments. While most super death benefits are paid within 3 months, for others it can take well over a year. The super laws do not specify a time period only that super needs to be paid to beneficiaries “as soon as practicable” after the death of the member.
February 13, 2025
Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth “Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke The Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) thinks that wealthy babyboomer Australians, particularly those with successful family-controlled businesses, are planning and structuring to dispose of assets in a way in which the tax outcomes might not be in accord with the ATO’s expectations. If you are within the ATO’s Top 500 (Australia's largest and wealthiest private groups) or Next 5,000 (Australian residents who, together with their associates, control a net wealth of over $50 million) programs, expect the ATO to be paying close attention to how money flows through the entities you control. A critical issue for many business owners is how to effectively (and compliantly) benefit from a successful business. In many cases, the owners have spent years building the business and the business has become not only a substantial asset, but a lucrative source of income either through salary and wages, dividends, or through the sale of shares or assets. Generally, under tax law, you can legitimately structure assets if there is a good reason to do so - like for asset protection, but if you tip across the line and the only viable reason for a structure is to reduce tax, then you risk the ATO taking a very close look at your operations or worse, denying any tax benefits under the general anti-avoidance rules in Part IVA of the tax rules, designed to combat “blatant, artificial or contrived” tax avoidance activities.  “We’re seeing that succession planning behaviour is primarily done by group heads who are approaching retirement. They typically own groups that family members are a part of, and wealth is transferred to the next generation to keep it within the family (via trusts and other means),” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke said in a recent update.
More Posts
Share by: