Blog Layout

Audit Lowe Down – Are Special Purpose Financial Statements Still Acceptable for Not-For-Profit (NFP) Entities?

Lowe Lippmann Chartered Accountants

Are Special Purpose Financial Statements Still Acceptable for Not-For-Profit (NFP) Entities?


Following on from our post 23rd October 2024 which addressed special purpose financial statements in relation to for-profit entities, we have received a number of questions regarding the same topic for not-for-profit entities.


Not-for-profit entities may continue to choose to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements (SPFS) if they assess themselves as non-reporting entities. Per Statement of Accounting Concepts 1 (SAC 1), a non-reporting entity is one where users, such as donors, members, creditors, or regulators, are not reliant on general-purpose financial reports for making decisions. This assessment is not static; it must be revisited annually by the governing body to ensure it remains accurate.


Although NFPs self-assess their reporting status, it is crucial to remember that there may be legislation governing financial statements which can vary depending on the type of entity, the State of incorporation and ACNC registration. For instance, SPFS prepared under the ACNC Act must comply with either:

  • The full presentation and disclosure requirements in the compulsory standards for SPFS listed in section 60.30 of the ACNC Regulations (AASB 101, AASB 107, AASB 108, AASB 124, AASB 1048, AASB 1054) or
  • the relevant paragraphs from AASB 1054 and AASB 1060 being paragraphs 8, 11, 14-103, 106-110, 189-203 of AASB 1060 and paragraphs 1 to 6, 9, 9A, 9B and 17 of AASB 1054.


The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) is also developing a new Tier 3 standard specifically for smaller not-for-profits, we are expecting an exposure draft of the proposals by the end of 2024. This upcoming standard and proposed changes to the Conceptual Framework aims to simplify reporting requirements while mandating general purpose financial statements for more NFPs.


In conclusion, while SPFS might still be permissible, not-for-profits should carefully assess their reporting obligations and the needs of their users to ensure that your financial reporting remains relevant, compliant, and transparent while serving the best interests of your organisation and its stakeholders.


Monitoring the proposed developments from the AASB will allow you time to prepare for changes that might be needed.


Please do not hesitate to contact your Lowe Lippmann Relationship Partner if you wish to discuss any of these matters further.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation


Tax Alert - Will credit card surcharges be banned?

February 19, 2025
Will credit card surcharges be banned? If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? This alert looks at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But is the issue as simple as it seems?

Tax Alert - Is there a problem paying your super when you die?

February 17, 2025
Is there a problem paying your super when you die? The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies? The value of superannuation in Australia is now around $4.1 trillion. When you die, your super does not automatically form part of your estate but instead, is paid to your eligible beneficiaries by the fund trustee according to the fund rules, superannuation law, and any death benefit nomination you made. Complaints to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority ( AFCA ) about the handling of death benefits surged sevenfold between 2021 and 2023. The critical issue was delays in payments. While most super death benefits are paid within 3 months, for others it can take well over a year. The super laws do not specify a time period only that super needs to be paid to beneficiaries “as soon as practicable” after the death of the member.

Tax Alert - Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth

February 13, 2025
Why the ATO is targeting babyboomer wealth “Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke The Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) thinks that wealthy babyboomer Australians, particularly those with successful family-controlled businesses, are planning and structuring to dispose of assets in a way in which the tax outcomes might not be in accord with the ATO’s expectations. If you are within the ATO’s Top 500 (Australia's largest and wealthiest private groups) or Next 5,000 (Australian residents who, together with their associates, control a net wealth of over $50 million) programs, expect the ATO to be paying close attention to how money flows through the entities you control. A critical issue for many business owners is how to effectively (and compliantly) benefit from a successful business. In many cases, the owners have spent years building the business and the business has become not only a substantial asset, but a lucrative source of income either through salary and wages, dividends, or through the sale of shares or assets. Generally, under tax law, you can legitimately structure assets if there is a good reason to do so - like for asset protection, but if you tip across the line and the only viable reason for a structure is to reduce tax, then you risk the ATO taking a very close look at your operations or worse, denying any tax benefits under the general anti-avoidance rules in Part IVA of the tax rules, designed to combat “blatant, artificial or contrived” tax avoidance activities.  “We’re seeing that succession planning behaviour is primarily done by group heads who are approaching retirement. They typically own groups that family members are a part of, and wealth is transferred to the next generation to keep it within the family (via trusts and other means),” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke said in a recent update.
More Posts
Share by: